Prediction of Aleksandre Bakshi [484th] vs Michael Geerts [290th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W W L W W L L W W
Form
W L W W L W W L W LHead To Head: Bakshi 0 - 0 Geerts
Bakshi | Stats | Geerts |
---|---|---|
61% (11-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (14-12) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
484 | Ranking | 290 |
469 | Highest Rank | 212 |
27 | Age | 30 |
L | Plays | R |
0 | Titles | 10 |
57% (149-111) | Career Total W/L | 57% (388-295) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $34,000 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Aleksandre Bakshi vs Michael Geerts Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bakshi 0 - 0 Geerts
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakshi has won 43.95% of points on their second serve, while Geerts has won 46.6%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakshi, in recent form, has won 47.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Geerts has won 44.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.23% and 24.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bakshi has saved 53.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Geerts has saved 52.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bakshi has won 59.38% of matches played (W/L 38/ 26), with Geerts winning 58.82% (W/L 50/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bakshi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 106/ 70), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Geerts has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 179/ 109), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Bakshi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 18/ 15), where as Geerts has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.02% of matches (W/L 25/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakshi has played against opponents with an average rank of 468.97 while Geerts has played against players with an average rank of 369.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakshi has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Geerts has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakshi has converted 37.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Geerts has converted 33.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Aleksandre Bakshi Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Michal Krajci
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Niklas Schell
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Moise Kouame
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve %
56%
(
9 of
16)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
24
Total Points Won
14
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Federico Cina
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Filippo Moroni
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Amr Elsayed
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Damm
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
15
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
97%
(
31 of
32)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Faris Zakaryia
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Amr Elsayed
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Michael Geerts Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mika Brunold
Player
Michael Geerts
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Geerts
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Michael Geerts
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Geerts
Player
Robin Bertrand
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Geerts
Player
Paul Jubb
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alejandro Juan Mano
Player
Michael Geerts
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Geerts
Player
Michiel De Krom
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Michael Geerts
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(5) 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Peniston
Player
Michael Geerts
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Geerts
Player
James Story
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Bakshi vs Geerts?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Bakshi Vs Geerts is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57% (149/111) | Win/Loss | 57% (388/295) |
57% (330/254) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (876/679) |
52% (2821/2582) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7647/6965) |
0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
774 | Aces Total | 2149 |
0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
691 | Total Double Faults | 1463 |
1:17:53 | Average Match Time | 1:22:44 |
454.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 466.99 |
61% (8699/14222) | 1st Serve % | 59% (21955/37488) |
68% (5920/8699) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (15518/21955) |
49% (2725/5523) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7901/15533) |
45% (669/1492) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1556/3710) |
41% (5865/14409) | Return Points Win % | 39% (14866/37843) |
59% (147/251) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (382/671) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
53% (39/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (105/210) |
56% (40/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (94/199) |
86% (155/133) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (401/344) |
13% (155/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (401/57) |
16% (105/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (282/44) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Aleksandre Bakshi
View full predicted draw for Bakshi
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Michael Geerts
View full predicted draw for Geerts
Other Predictions
- Loading news...